Grounded draft
Every model-extracted step retains a bounded source reference and stays unconfirmed until reviewed.
AccessCrash turns supplied process instructions into a source-linked path, asks a human to confirm it, then tests whether a capability-constrained person can actually reach the promised outcome.

The same eligibility assumption is tested against two capability profiles. AccessCrash reports the first unavoidable barrier and the alternative routes that also fail, so a process owner can see the specific requirement breaking access.
The public site uses a visibly labeled bundled synthetic graph. Live GPT-5.6 compilation remains disabled until authenticated identity and persistent quota controls are in place.
The prototype translates a vague concern into a concrete graph, named capability assumptions and a repeatable before-and-after test.
Every model-extracted step retains a bounded source reference and stays unconfirmed until reviewed.
The reviewer owns the process model. The interface does not hide that responsibility behind AI confidence.
The engine follows the confirmed graph and capability profile; the model has zero outcome votes.
It does not approve benefits, make legal or clinical decisions, certify accessibility, independently verify citations or prove that an institution follows its written process. Its result is only as complete as the confirmed graph and capability assumptions.
ProofLatch governs release evidence, Gatehold governs agent clearance and ExitCanary tests SaaS exit fidelity.